A different type of 'substantial contribution' may not make it into local print media.Note to Slim: what exactly is the difference between identifying him as a 'tool' rather than as an (my preferred) idiot? Both are equally dangerous aren't they?
On the Crikey web site on 23 February in a report by Bernard Keane (behind their subscriber paywall) about Li'l Bil) Shorten's parliamentary performance the last three paragraphs of the report give a rather sad insight into the parliamentary performance of the Member for Herbert, Ewen Jones -
"It’s only early in the parliamentary year but a low point was plumbed right at the end of question time when Kevin Rudd rose to discuss the Middle East and, in particular, Libya, revealing the Libyan ambassador had been called in for a dressing down and that he’d spoken to the Bahraini foreign minister about the killing of protesters there.What a representative of the citizens of the greater Townsville region!
This was, plainly, a matter of complete non-interest to a number of Coalition MPs who used the answer to offer doubtless witty advice to Rudd. Peter Dutton and Greg Hunt both heckled and interjected. And sitting up in the back corner, Queensland MP Ewen Jones spent the entire answer jeering and laughing as Rudd discussed Middle East protests, the slaughter of demonstrators and the presence of Australians in Libya.
Classy."
Cheers,
Slim
Mind you, "The Townsville Tool" (or even better the "Tool of Townsville") has a certain ring to it. But then, "Idiot" is a lot more to the point and "Schoolyard Idiot" would be even more descriptive....
1 comment:
Hi Islander,
I'll stay with the "tool" because an idiot cannot help but to be 'incapable of rational conduct'. Jones actually chose to behave in the manner reported which may indicate some level of rationality; although not a level with which the voters in Herbert would be pleased.
Most unfortunately Jones is not the only parliamentary tool; leave space for plurals.
Cheers,
Slim
Post a Comment